Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Developing a decision-making framework for resolving conflicts when selecting windows and blinds
Linnaeus University, Vaxjo, Department of Forestry and Wood Technology, Vaxjo, Sweden.
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Civil Engineeering and Lighting Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4216-9165
Department of Forestry and Wood Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Linnaeus University, Vaxjo, Department of Built Environment and Energy Technology, Vaxjo, Sweden.
2019 (English)In: Architectural Engineering and Design Management, ISSN 1745-2007, E-ISSN 1752-7589, Vol. 15, no 5, p. 357-381Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Windows and blinds play a significant role in both shaping energy consumption and enhancing indoor comfort. But there are still difficulties with selecting windows and blinds due to the existence of potential conflicts between visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life-cycle cost. A literature review was conducted with the purpose of developing a decision-making framework that resolves the conflicts, and allows selecting a window and blind design based on trade-off between visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life-cycle cost. The decision-making framework was developed by integrating non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II as an optimization algorithm with analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision-making method. The optimization algorithm considers different window and blind design variables and analyses multiple designs, while the multi-criteria decision-making method ranks the optimization results and selects a trade-off design. An operating package enabled the decision-making framework to be automated. The operating package was obtained by coupling EnergyPlus as a simulation tool and modeFRONTIER as an integration platform. The decision-making framework was developed to select a trade-off window and blind design through intelligent use of simulation in analysing big-data in built environment, energy and cost sectors. Application of the framework ensures the minimum visual and thermal comfort thresholds with the lowest energy demand and cost. Architects and designers can use the framework during the design or renovation phase of residential and commercial buildings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2019. Vol. 15, no 5, p. 357-381
Keywords [en]
analytical hierarchy process, big-data, framework design, multi-criteria decision-making, non-dominated genetic algorithm II, optimization, Trade-off design, Big data, Costs, Economic and social effects, Energy utilization, Genetic algorithms, Life cycle, Office buildings, Thermal comfort, Framework designs, Multi criteria decision making, Decision making
National Category
Construction Management Construction Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-42052DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2018.1537235ISI: 000482063700004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85055576461Local ID: HOA JTH 2019OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-42052DiVA, id: diva2:1266913
Available from: 2018-11-29 Created: 2018-11-29 Last updated: 2025-02-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Johansson, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Peter
By organisation
JTH, Civil Engineeering and Lighting Science
In the same journal
Architectural Engineering and Design Management
Construction ManagementConstruction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 269 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf