System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Occupational therapy assessments and interventions for adults with depression in psychiatry: a systematic review
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Rehabilitation.
2018 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Background: Occupational therapy has long-standing practices in psychiatry. Nowadays, occupational therapists need appropriate tools and methods for assessment and intervention. People who suffer from depression are one of the patient groups which might have lost their normal routine and performance in life. Aim: To review the literature on practices of occupational therapy in psychiatry with adults suffering from depression Methods: The study design was a systematic review. Databases that were used were AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PuBMED. The handling of the data started by dividing the articles into three categories: assessment tools, methods and approaches, and activities. These categories were formulated with the deductive content analysis. Nineteen articles were identified that met inclusion criteria. Findings: Standardized and non-standardized assessment tools were used. Most of these tools were based on Model of Human Occupation. Activities, used in occupational therapy, included often creative methods. Identified methods and approaches were group interventions, investigating patient’s life span, and multidisciplinary approaches. The majority of selected articles were of low to moderate quality and of low levels of evidence. Conclusions: Information gained is more descriptive rather than scientifically significant evidence of the different practices. More high quality evidence is needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 36
Keywords [en]
practices, standardized tools, non-standardized tools, creative activities, groups, multi-disciplinary, the Model of Human Occupation, the Model of Therapeutic Power
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-42115ISRN: JU-HHJ-ATA-2-20180123OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-42115DiVA, id: diva2:1265561
Subject / course
HHJ, Occupational Therapy
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-12-12 Created: 2018-11-24 Last updated: 2020-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Rehabilitation
Occupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 644 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf