Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patients’ self-reported nausea: Validation of the Numerical Rating Scale and of a daily summary of repeated Numerical Rating Scale scores
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Nursing Science. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. ADULT. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Futurum, Academy for Health and Care, Region Jönköping County, Sweden.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Nursing Science. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. ADULT. Sweden Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1884-5696
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
2019 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN 0962-1067, E-ISSN 1365-2702, Vol. 28, no 5-6, p. 959-968Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim and objectives: To validate the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for postoperative nausea assessments, and determine whether a central tendency, median, based on patients’ self-rated nausea is a clinically applicable daily measure to describe patients’ nausea after major surgery.

Background: Postoperative nausea causes major discomfort, risks for complications and prolonged hospital stays. The NRS is recommended for the assessment of pain but is little explored for assessing nausea.

Design: A repeated measure design was carried out on patients who had undergone major surgery in three Swedish hospitals.

Methods: Nonparametric statistical methods were used to analyse (a) associations between the NRS and a verbal scale (no, mild, moderate and severe) and (b) to analyse associations between Measure 1 (nausea scores postoperative Day 1) and Measure 2 (retrospective nausea scores at rest and during activity, postoperative Day 2). Reporting of this research adheres to the Strobe Guidelines.

Results: The mean age of the 479 patients (44% women) in the sample was 65 years (range, 22–93 years). Self-assessed nausea scores from the NRS and the verbal scale correlated well (rS pearman= 0.79). Correlation between nausea at rest and nausea during activity was rS pearman= 0.81. The calculated median scores (Measure 1) showed only moderate correlations with retrospective nausea scores (Measure 2); 4–9 ratings, rS pearman= 0.41; 6–9 ratings, rS pearman= 0.54.

Conclusions: Numeric Rating Scale scores showed strong associations with a verbal scale; therefore, the NRS seems to be a valid tool to measure nausea intensity. The quality of daily summarised median nausea scores needs to be further explored before clinical use.

Relevance to clinical practice: The use of the NRS in assessments of nausea in postoperative care will facilitate communication between patients and health care professionals regarding nausea intensity. When documenting nausea, it seems unnecessary to distinguish nausea at rest from nausea during activity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2019. Vol. 28, no 5-6, p. 959-968
Keywords [en]
assessment, nausea, Numeric Rating Scale, postoperative, validation
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-42100DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14705ISI: 000458362400024PubMedID: 30357970Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85056162192Local ID: PP HHJ 2019 embargo 12OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-42100DiVA, id: diva2:1264754
Available from: 2018-11-21 Created: 2018-11-21 Last updated: 2019-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(503 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 503 kBChecksum SHA-512
9492b675d2c6998728318ad3d6f98b98b1ed0157df4be7cd6da89a53b268e214283bd785a41ccb013ef47db936461131bb326578f311a1d17de9b25c84e996a6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Wikström, LottaBroström, AndersEriksson, Kerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wikström, LottaBroström, AndersEriksson, Kerstin
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Nursing ScienceHHJ. ADULTSchool of Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf