Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adding high-intensity interval training to conventional training modalities: optimizing health-related outcomes during chemotherapy for breast cancer: the OptiTrain randomized controlled trial
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden / Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden / Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden / School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, ISSN 0167-6806, E-ISSN 1573-7217, Vol. 168, no 1, p. 79-93Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: Exercise training is an effective and safe way to counteract cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). High-intensity interval training has proven beneficial for the health of clinical populations. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the effects of resistance and high-intensity interval training (RT-HIIT), and moderate-intensity aerobic and high-intensity interval training (AT-HIIT) to usual care (UC) in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was CRF and the secondary endpoints were HRQoL and cancer treatment-related symptoms.

METHODS: Two hundred and forty women planned to undergo chemotherapy were randomized to supervised RT-HIIT, AT-HIIT, or UC. Measurements were performed at baseline and at 16 weeks. Questionnaires included Piper Fatigue Scale, EORTC-QLQ-C30, and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale.

RESULTS: The RT-HIIT group was superior to UC for CRF: total CRF (p = 0.02), behavior/daily life (p = 0.01), and sensory/physical (p = 0.03) CRF. Role functioning significantly improved while cognitive functioning was unchanged for RT-HIIT compared to declines shown in the UC group (p = 0.04). AT-HIIT significantly improved emotional functioning versus UC (p = 0.01) and was superior to UC for pain symptoms (p = 0.03). RT-HIIT reported a reduced symptom burden, while AT-HIIT remained stable compared to deteriorations shown by UC (p < 0.01). Only RT-HIIT was superior to UC for total symptoms (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: 16 weeks of resistance and HIIT was effective in preventing increases in CRF and in reducing symptom burden for patients during chemotherapy for breast cancer. These findings add to a growing body of evidence supporting the inclusion of structured exercise prescriptions, including HIIT, as a vital component of cancer rehabilitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02522260.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2018. Vol. 168, no 1, p. 79-93
Keywords [en]
Breast cancer, Chemotherapy, Concurrent training, Health-related quality of life, High-intensity interval training, Symptom burden
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Research subject
Wellbeing in long-term health problems (WeLHP)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-39224DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4571-3ISI: 000425747200009PubMedID: 29139007Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85033731943OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-39224DiVA, id: diva2:1201746
Available from: 2018-03-29 Created: 2018-04-26 Last updated: 2020-01-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Browall, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Browall, Maria
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Nursing ScienceHHJ. IMPROVE (Improvement, innovation, and leadership in health and welfare)
In the same journal
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 110 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf