System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing coverage of disruptive change in social and traditional media: Evidence from the sharing economy
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Media, Management and Transformation Centre (MMTC). Stockholm School of Economics Institute for Research, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2874-017x
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Media, Management and Transformation Centre (MMTC). Science and Technology Studies, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, The Ratio Institute, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8625-8744
2018 (English)In: Technological forecasting & social change, ISSN 0040-1625, E-ISSN 1873-5509, Vol. 129, p. 339-344Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

How do social media differ from traditional media in their coverage of disruptive technological change? We explore how two entrants transforming the personal transportation and accommodation sectors are covered in social and traditional media. Using content analysis, we conclude that these two forms of media differ substantially. Traditional media is focused on how the two entrants affect society and their respective sectors at large, whilst social media instead function as accelerators for the entrants as they receive predominantly positive coverage. Therefore, our findings suggest that the rise of social media may accelerate the growth of disruptive innovations which can, in turn, reduce the window for response.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 129, p. 339-344
Keywords [en]
Disruptive innovation, Institutional change, Traditional media, Social media, Social media analytics
National Category
Business Administration Media and Communication Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-38249DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.038ISI: 000430763400032Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85032791570OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-38249DiVA, id: diva2:1168136
Available from: 2017-12-20 Created: 2017-12-20 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Laurell, ChristoferSandström, Christian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Laurell, ChristoferSandström, Christian
By organisation
JIBS, Business AdministrationJIBS, Media, Management and Transformation Centre (MMTC)
In the same journal
Technological forecasting & social change
Business AdministrationMedia and Communication Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 372 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf