Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The take-off phase in transtibial amputee high jump
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Rehabilitation. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. Prosthetics and Orthotics. Laboratory for Biomechanics and Motor Control, Karolinska Institutet and The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
2008 (English)In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, ISSN 0309-3646, E-ISSN 1746-1553, Vol. 32, no 2, p. 160-171Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

An analysis of the take-off technique in transtibial amputee high jump was performed on two athletes (both using intact limb take-off) competing in the high jump finals of the 2004 Paralympic Games. Two digital video cameras were used to film the event with the data later digitized and reconstructed using standard 3D direct linear transformation (DLT) procedures. Some similarities with non-amputee high jump technique were noted in that centre of mass height was low at touch-down (TD), there was a similar magnitude of negative vertical velocity at TD, and most of the vertical velocity generated occurred in the first half of the take-off phase. However, both transtibial amputee athletes exhibited a slower horizontal approach velocity, a lower positive vertical take-off velocity, a more upright position at touch-down and a greater range of motion of the hip throughout the take-off phase compared to what is known about non-amputee high jump technique. These differences may be associated with constraints of taking off from the prosthetic limb on the previous step, resulting in having to adopt a different posture at touch-down compared to non-amputees. Understanding transtibial amputee high jump technique and the differences compared to what is known about non-amputee technique has implications for coaching and improving performance in prosthetic sport.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2008. Vol. 32, no 2, p. 160-171
Keywords [en]
Athletics, track and field, biomechanics, technique, below-knee
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-6717DOI: 10.1080/03093640802016266OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-6717DiVA, id: diva2:114141
Available from: 2008-11-06 Created: 2008-11-06 Last updated: 2021-06-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Nolan, Lee

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nolan, Lee
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of RehabilitationHHJ. Prosthetics and Orthotics
In the same journal
Prosthetics and Orthotics International
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 334 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf