Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Responsibility versus commerciality: Paradoxical message construction in the case of avalanche airbag producers
Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication, HLK, Media and Communication Studies.
2017 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Economic sustainable performance always includes opposing aims, thus today many businesses are facing a social versus financial dilemma. In this study, the case of avalanche airbag producers is adapted. Their communicative challenge is to act commercially viable and to be socially responsible at the same time.

This study is theoretically based on risk communication, paradox theory, semiotics and framing. As it is a qualitative study, semiotic analysis from a multimodal approach is applied in order to investigate how the chosen companies (ORTOVOX and Backcountry Access) maneuver within this tension in their communication discursively. Two educational videos were selected as material.

The research question addressed in this thesis is: How do the producers of avalanche airbags deal with the paradox of being commercially feasible and socially responsible within their educational video? This is investigated by systematically analyzing the material and looking especially at visual-, auditory- and lexical semiotic choices as well as the opposing discourses of fear and joy.

The analysis revealed two completely different communicative strategies. While the company Backcountry Access stressed the joy aspect and preparedness action within its video, ORTOVOX emphasizes the fear discourse and works with fear messages. Furthermore, a significant difference within the lexical choices was identified. Backcountry Access uses informal lexis and represents the actor as a cool guy and in harmony with the community role. Whereas, ORTOVOX stresses the expert knowledge by using formal language and scientific terms. Also, the visual construction of the social actors is in accordance with these findings. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , 42 p.
Keyword [en]
discursive challenges, paradox, risk communication, semiotic analysis
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-36305ISRN: JU-HLK-MKA-2-20170110OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-36305DiVA: diva2:1112810
Subject / course
HLK, Media and Communication Studies
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-06-21 Created: 2017-06-20 Last updated: 2017-06-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1244 kB)19 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1244 kBChecksum SHA-512
c6f476d8872979676ec3090a8887e9ff077ec874532f4a7dd885b6020a3fe5397458700a47450cacefccec03adfd408ca0d56aa58e93211ec03d9bf8ecb8fdfb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gruber, Susanne
By organisation
HLK, Media and Communication Studies
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 19 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf