Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inter-firm Comparability in Sustainability Reports: A study of GRI G4 implementation by companies in the EU energy sector
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration.
2017 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Background: Sustainability reporting is increasingly recognised by both companies and stakeholders to be a valuable tool of communication. However, the quality of these reports has come in to question where the inter-firm comparability principle, accentuated by the Global Reporting Initiative, is argued by scholars to be ineffective. Inter-firm comparability being essential for the user of the reports to understand how companies compare to others therefore needs to be analyzed.

Purpose: The objective of this paper is to study the inter-firm comparability of sustainability reports among companies in the EU energy sector that employ the GRI G4 guidelines.

Method: This study conducts a comparative content analysis of 13 energy companies’ sustainability reports. The systematic comparison conducted on the 28 most common G4 indicators in the energy companies’ sustainability reports shed light on the underlying conditions of inter-firm comparability.

Conclusion and Contributions: The results of this study show that it is difficult to compare sustainability reports due to the qualitative nature of most indicators, the absent explanatory information, the incomplete disclosure on many indicators, and the extensive amount of superfluous information included in the reports. The moral and managerial branch of the stakeholder theory is further applied in the study to discuss the possible explanations as to why inter-firm comparability issues exist. The outcome of the study will therefore provide a deeper understanding of the inherent comparability issues and to possibly aid future improvements of the reports and their guidelines.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , 100 p.
Keyword [en]
GRI, G4, Energy, CSR, EU, Comparability
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-36006ISRN: JU-IHH-FÖA-2-20170474OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-36006DiVA: diva2:1108286
Subject / course
IHH, Business Administration
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-06-27 Created: 2017-06-12 Last updated: 2017-06-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1374 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1374 kBChecksum SHA-512
5d80655c2fd177792b734ab6bd398f3cb551edd4dd2964d7c1be53c413d94c32d9a89ade2b47a335605fc4fa82ce99725385bd657446b41cd74d1bb8f371b926
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olsson, DavidFunhammar, Ida
By organisation
JIBS, Business Administration
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 58 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 307 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf