Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Structured risk assessment instruments: A systematic review of implementation determinants
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Linköping University, Vadstena, Sweden.
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Medical Specialists, Linköping University, Motala, Sweden.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Behavioural Science and Social Work.
2016 (English)In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, ISSN 1321-8719, E-ISSN 1934-1687, Vol. 23, no 4, 602-628 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research-based structured risk assessment instruments (SRAIs) can improve violence risk assessment and clinical judgements in mental health and correctional services. Practical challenges of implementing SRAIs have led to calls for more research to understand the determinants influencing this process. Studies describing determinants for SRAI implementation in psychiatric, correctional, or community in-patient settings were systematically reviewed. Findings were analysed according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A total of 11 studies were included. Four types of main implementation determinants were found: characteristics of the SRAI; users of the SRAI; inner setting; and process. Findings underscore the importance of applying a multifactorial approach to the implementation of SRAIs to address many different barriers and facilitators. More stringent research is needed to obtain more solid evidence of factors that impede or enable SRAI implementation, especially regarding patient perspectives and outer setting determinants. Constructing shared concepts of determinants across research fields could further aid information transferences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 23, no 4, 602-628 p.
Keyword [en]
Determinants, Implementation, Structured risk assessment, Systematic review, Violence
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-34748DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2015.1084661ISI: 000383249100010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84945205337OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-34748DiVA: diva2:1066134
Available from: 2017-01-17 Created: 2017-01-17 Last updated: 2017-03-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Behavioural Science and Social Work
In the same journal
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf