Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence 2.0: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. IMPROVE (Improvement, innovation, and leadership in health and welfare). Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Journal of Surgical Research, ISSN 0022-4804, E-ISSN 1095-8673, Vol. 200, no 2, 676-682 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 200, no 2, 676-682 p.
Keyword [en]
Healthcare quality, Publication guideline, Quality improvement, consensus, human, information processing, methodology, practice guideline, publication, standards, total quality management, Focus Groups, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Research Design
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-34700DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.015ISI: 000366841500033PubMedID: 26515734Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84966322367Local ID: HHJIMPROVEISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-34700DiVA: diva2:1065409
Available from: 2017-01-16 Created: 2017-01-16 Last updated: 2017-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Fulltext(524 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 524 kBChecksum SHA-512
8790f27e1cfddd00a22ce85b21b6fc412695cd288994a9c6d80fd5486543337d049c0b625f731794532f25ef113bcba61eb3d7ef02df45e5c6ffefb4cad3de99
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Batalden, Paul B.
By organisation
The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and WelfareHHJ. IMPROVE (Improvement, innovation, and leadership in health and welfare)
In the same journal
Journal of Surgical Research
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 18 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf