Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Formal intergenerational mentoring at Australian Men's Sheds: a targeted survey about mentees, mentors, programmes and quality
School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Richmond, NSW, Australia.
Intellectual Disability, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia .
School of Education, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia .
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Health & Social Care in the Community, ISSN 0966-0410, E-ISSN 1365-2524, Vol. 24, no 6, e131-e143 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Intergenerational mentoring enables a purposeful exchange of skills and knowledge to enhance individual and social outcomes for sub-groups at risk of health and social disparities. Male intergenerational mentoring may be an approach to help address these disparities in young men. Over 1000 Men's Sheds operate in Australia with 39% providing some form of mentoring mainly to youth. Yet, little is known about the variables intrinsic to creating and running quality programmes. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of formal intergenerational mentoring programmes, review their quality against the Australian Youth Mentoring Network (AYMN) quality benchmarks, and identify the factors that predict quality in these programmes. All known Australian Men's Sheds were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional survey. Forty sheds with formal mentor programmes completed the survey for a total of 387 mentees (mean = 9.7 mentees/programme), the majority being male. The majority of mentor programme facilitators were unpaid male volunteers aged 61 years and older, and programmes were unfunded. Promoting social and emotional well-being of the mentees was the primary focus in more than half of the programmes, and working on a shared construction project was the most common activity. Respondents rated the three most important factors that influenced programme effectiveness as being: (i) meaningful activities; (ii) mentors’ approach; and (iii) a safe environment. Univariate analyses revealed that mentoring programmes that had a system in place for screening mentors, trained mentors and evaluated the programme were most likely to rate highly against the AYMN quality benchmarks. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 24, no 6, e131-e143 p.
Keyword [en]
intergenerational mentoring, Men's Sheds, mentees, mentors, social inclusion, youth mentoring, adult, Australian, human, juvenile, major clinical study, male, middle aged, program effectiveness, running, screening, teacher, univariate analysis, volunteer, wellbeing
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Social Work
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-34454DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12267PubMedID: 26285782ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84991087059Local ID: HHJCHILDISOAI: diva2:1058471
Available from: 2016-12-21 Created: 2016-12-21 Last updated: 2016-12-21

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkmer, Torbjörn
By organisation
HHJ. CHILDHHJ, Dep. of Rehabilitation
In the same journal
Health & Social Care in the Community
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and EpidemiologySocial Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 4 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link