Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Seeking the Holy Grail of organisational development: A synthesis of integral theory, spiral dynamics, corporate transformation and action inquiry
Integral Leadership Centre, Graduate School of Management, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Integral Leadership Centre, Graduate School of Management, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
2005 (English)In: Leadership & Organization Development Journal, ISSN 0143-7739, E-ISSN 1472-5347, Vol. 26, no 2, 86-105 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose - There are several stage-based models of organisational development (OD) that provide a systematic overview of the developmental potential of organisations. This paper compares four such models - Ken Wilber's integral theory, the spiral dynamics model of Don Beck and Chris Cowan, Richard Barrett's corporate transformation model, and William Torbert's action inquiry model - with the aim of presenting an integrated account of the stages of OD.

Design/methodology/approach - Integral theory is used as the basis for considering the theoretical scope of these other models of OD. The integral framework is specifically designed to recognise the valid insights of other models of organisational change and, as such, is well suited for situating those insights in a comprehensive and coherent approach for mapping the developmental paths of organisations. The models considered represent some of the more innovative OD approaches.

Findings - From the comparative analysis an integral model for OD is described. The description includes a new definition of OD which is based on integral theory's core developmental principles.

Research limitations/implications - The proposed framework provides a means for assessing the scope and specificity of other approaches to OD. It also provides criteria for distinguishing between those approaches that are concerned with incremental or continuous change and those that focus on transformative development.

Practical implications - The comparative analysis and resulting framework will assist practitioners and consultants in the OD field in developing a better understanding of the relationships between various stage-based approaches to OD. Originality/value - This paper provides a comprehensive framework that can assist in comparing and situating the many approaches to OD that are currently available.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 26, no 2, 86-105 p.
Keyword [en]
Dynamics, Organizational development
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-32194DOI: 10.1108/01437730510582536Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-19744362464OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-32194DiVA: diva2:1044050
Available from: 2016-11-01 Created: 2016-11-01 Last updated: 2017-04-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edwards, Mark G.
In the same journal
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf