Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Family ownership and R&D intensity in small- and medium-sized firms
IULM University, Milano, Italy.
Högskolan i Jönköping, Internationella Handelshögskolan, IHH, Center for Family Enterprise and Ownership (CeFEO).
IULM University, Milano, Italy.
Centre for Family Business, Institute for Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development, Lancaster University Management School, United Kingdom.
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: The Journal of product innovation management, ISSN 0737-6782, E-ISSN 1540-5885, Vol. 32, nr 3, s. 349-360Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Research was largely consistent in predicting a negative relationship between family ownership and research and development (R&D) intensity until Chrisman and Patel, using a behavioral agency model (BAM), called this general assumption into question. They argued that publicly owned family firms typically invest less in R&D than nonfamily-owned firms. This behavior may however be reversed if economic performance levels are below family aspirations or if family long-term goals, such as pursuing strong transgenerational family control, are highly valued. While most researchers, like Chrisman and Patel, primarily focused on large listed firms, more research on the relationship between family ownership and R&D intensity in privately held small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is required. This is because firm size can play an important role in understanding the innovation management behavior of firms. Building on the BAM perspective, in the present paper it is argued that Chrisman and Patel's results can be extended to the context of SMEs, albeit with one important specification: the relationship between family ownership and R&D intensity is likely to be contingent on the way the family has invested its wealth. Specifically, it is contended that in the context of SMEs, where goals are more fluid and mixed, when there is a high overlap between family wealth and firm equity (i.e., most of the family's wealth is invested in the firm) the relationship between family ownership and R&D intensity is negative because of the family owners' greater desire to protect their socioemotional wealth (SEW). However, if the overlap between the family's total wealth and single firm equity is low (i.e., firm equity is just a small part of the total family wealth), the relationship between family ownership and R&D intensity is positive as the low overlap between family wealth and firm equity reduces the family's loss aversion propensity. In such a situation, family ownership is likely to foster R&D intensity because of the long-term orientation of family owners that increases the family firm's propensity to bear the risk of investing in R&D activities. The hypothesis is tested and confirmed in a study of 240 small- and medium-sized firms based in Italy. The paper contributes to the literature in several ways. First, adding to the literature on innovation management and R&D intensity, it increases the understanding of what drives or inhibits R&D investments in SMEs when a family is involved in the ownership of the firm. This is particularly important because research on innovation management, as well as research on R&D intensity in family firms, is primarily focused on large firms and much less on SMEs. Second, the study complements arguments from prior research on the correlates of R&D intensity in large listed firms, showing that the BAM and SEW perspective offer a theoretical framework that is also able to illustrate the complex nature of innovation management in the context of SMEs. Third, the study contributes to research on the effects of family ownership on the general functioning of a firm. In particular, it provides new insights into how family ownership may affect R&D intensity.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2015. Vol. 32, nr 3, s. 349-360
Emneord [en]
Economic performance, Innovation management, Long-term goals, Long-term orientation, Research and development, Small and medium sized firms, Small and medium-sized enterprise, Theoretical framework
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-28258ISI: 000352636400004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84926420384Lokal ID: IHHCeFEOISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-28258DiVA, id: diva2:866805
Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-11-03 Laget: 2015-11-03 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-01bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(454 kB)631 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 454 kBChecksum SHA-512
f929dde53f7ddd15d0a2e49024285419ec2aa2019a1d1db43716c78bfa829e6b51689c815f6b0087bf8e882f18d8e0ae3cc7b0b6c8c954d8e5866cf310fbc19f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Scopus

Personposter BETA

Nordqvist, Mattias

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nordqvist, Mattias
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
The Journal of product innovation management

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 631 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 1386 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf