Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Malawian prosthetic and orthotic users' mobility and satisfaction with their lower limb assistive device
Högskolan i Jönköping, Hälsohögskolan, HHJ. Ortopedteknisk plattform. Högskolan i Jönköping, Hälsohögskolan, HHJ, Avd. för rehabilitering.
Lunds universitet.
Högskolan i Jönköping, Hälsohögskolan, HHJ. Ortopedteknisk plattform. Högskolan i Jönköping, Hälsohögskolan, HHJ, Avd. för rehabilitering.
Högskolan i Jönköping, Hälsohögskolan, HHJ, Avd. för naturvetenskap och biomedicin. Högskolan i Jönköping, Hälsohögskolan, HHJ. ADULT.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-9042-4832
2013 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 45, nr 4, s. 385-391Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients’ mobility and satisfaction with their lower limb prosthetic or orthotic device and related service delivery in Malawi and to compare groups of patients regarding type and level of device and demographics.

METHODS: Questionnaires were used to collect self-report data from 83 patients.

RESULTS: Ninety percent of prostheses or orthoses were in use by patients, but approximately half of these needed repair. Thirty-nine percent reported pain when using their assistive device. The majority of patients were able to rise from a chair (77%), move around the home (80%), walk on uneven ground (59%) and travel by bus or car (56%). However, patients had difficulties walking up and down hills (78%) and stairs (60%). In general, patients were quite satisfied with their assistive device (mean of 3.9 out of 5) and very satisfied with the service provided (mean of 4.4 out of 5). Access to repairs and servicing were rated as most important, followed by durability and follow-up services. Lack of finances to pay for transport was a barrier to accessing the prosthetic and orthotic centre.

CONCLUSION: Patients were satisfied with the assistive device and service received, despite reporting pain associated with use of the device and difficulties ambulating on challenging surfaces.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2013. Vol. 45, nr 4, s. 385-391
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-20686DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1117ISI: 000317705900010PubMedID: 23450432Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84876000541OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-20686DiVA, id: diva2:607753
Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-02-25 Laget: 2013-02-25 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-16bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Prosthetic and Orthotic Services in Developing Countries
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Prosthetic and Orthotic Services in Developing Countries
2014 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Aim: The overall aim of this thesis was to generate further knowledge about prosthetic and orthotic services in developing countries. In particular, the thesis focused on patient mobility and satisfaction with prosthetic and orthotic devices, satisfaction with service delivery, and the views of staff regarding clinical practice and education.

Methods: Questionnaires, including QUEST 2.0, were used to collect self-reported data from 83 patients in Malawi and 139 patients in Sierra Leone. In addition, 15 prosthetic/orthotic technicians in Sierra Leone and 15 prosthetists/orthotists in Pakistan were interviewed.

Results: The majority of patients used their prosthetic or orthotic devices (90% in Malawi, and 86% in Sierra Leone), but half of the assistive devices in use needed repair. Approximately one third of patients reported pain when using their assistive device (40% in Malawi and 34% in Sierra Leone). Patients had difficulties, or could not walk at all, with their prosthetic and/or orthotic device in the following situations; uneven ground (41% in Malawi and 65% in Sierra Leone), up and down hills (78% in Malawi and 75% in Sierra Leone), on stairs (60% in Malawi and 66% in Sierra Leone). Patients were quite satisfied or very satisfied with their assistive device (mean 3.9 in Malawi and 3.7 in Sierra Leone out of 5) and the services provided (mean 4.4 in Malawi and 3.7 in Sierra Leone out of 5), (p<0.001), but reported many problems (418 comments made in Malawi and 886 in Sierra Leone). About half of the patients did not, or sometimes did not, have the ability to access services (71% in Malawi and 40% in Sierra Leone). In relation to mobility and service delivery, orthotic patients and patients using above-knee assistive devices in Malawi and Sierra Leone had the poorest results. In Sierra Leone, women had poorer results than men. The general condition of devices and the ability to walk on uneven ground and on stairs were associated with both satisfaction of assistive devices and service received. Professionals’ views of service delivery and related education resulted in four themes common to Sierra Leone and Pakistan: 1) Low awareness and prioritising of prosthetic and orthotic services; 2) Difficulty managing specific pathological conditions and problems with materials; 3) The need for further education and desire for professional development; 4) Desire for improvements in prosthetic and orthotic education. A further two themes were unique to Sierra Leone; 1) People with disabilities have low social status; 2) Limited access to prosthetic and orthotic services.

Conclusion: High levels of satisfaction and mobility while using assistive devices were reported in Malawi and Sierra Leone, although patients experienced pain and difficulties when walking on challenging surfaces. Limitations to the effectiveness of assistive devices, poor comfort, and limited access to follow-up services and repairs were issues that needed to be addressed. Educating prosthetic and orthotic staff to a higher level was considered necessary in Sierra Leone. In Pakistan, prosthetic and orthotic education could be improved by modifying programme content, improving teachers’ knowledge, improving access to information, and addressing issues of gender equality.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Jönköping: School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Sweden, 2014. s. 129
Serie
Dissertation Series. School of Health Sciences, ISSN 1654-3602 ; 56
Serie
The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, ISSN 1650-1128 ; 66
Emneord
Assistive device, Convention of Rights of Persons with Disabilities, disability, low-income countries, mobility, orthosis, prosthesis, satisfaction, QUEST
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-24973 (URN)978-91-85835-55-3 (ISBN)
Disputas
2014-11-07, Forum Humanum, Hälsohögskolan i Jönköping, Jönköping, 13:00 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2014-10-13 Laget: 2014-10-13 Sist oppdatert: 2014-10-13bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(339 kB)223 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 339 kBChecksum SHA-512
612cad357cb1cd310a8f7c02cd091adb77d44351f931b05c5043e10326dc82495061484fe73838e12f22700f01a2f56e67a99ab5b6ce6d3f660511ddfcfc5406
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Magnusson, LinaRamstrand, NerrolynFransson, Eleonor

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Magnusson, LinaRamstrand, NerrolynFransson, Eleonor
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 223 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 656 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf