Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A meta-analysis assessing reliability of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: Implications for compulsive eating and obesity
Government Hospitals, Manama, Bahrain; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia; Research Laboratory: Education, Motricity, Sport and Health, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Department of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Mainz, Germany; Research Laboratory, Molecular Bases of Human Pathology, Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Obesity Reviews, ISSN 1467-7881, E-ISSN 1467-789X, Vol. 26, no 4, article id e13881Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
00. Sustainable Development, 3. Good health and well-being
Abstract [en]

Food addiction (FA) is linked to eating disorders and obesity. The Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS), which has various versions in different languages, is widely used to assess FA worldwide. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the YFAS through reliability generalization meta-analysis (REGEMA). From their inception until April 2024, a comprehensive systematic review across more than 30 databases was conducted to identify studies reporting reliability measures (e.g., Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega) of the YFAS. Sixty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a median sample size of 451 participants. The results of the random-effects meta-analysis showed a high pooled reliability coefficient (α = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.86 p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was also estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis of 10 studies, resulting in a pooled test-retest correlation coefficient of intraclass coefficients of (ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.84, p < 0.001). These findings highlight the consistency and robustness of the YFAS in detecting FA across studies, suggesting its reliability for screening for FA-related disordered eating.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025. Vol. 26, no 4, article id e13881
Keywords [en]
Cronbach's alpha, food addiction, meta‐analysis, reliability
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-66902DOI: 10.1111/obr.13881ISI: 001390241900001PubMedID: 39715731Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85212792845Local ID: HOA;intsam;991260OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-66902DiVA, id: diva2:1924485
Available from: 2025-01-06 Created: 2025-01-06 Last updated: 2025-03-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Pakpour, Amir H.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pakpour, Amir H.
By organisation
HHJ, Department of Nursing Science
In the same journal
Obesity Reviews
Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf