Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Applying models of co-production in the context of health and wellbeing: A narrative review to guide future practice
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare. Methodologies Division, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8781-6675
Brighton & Sussex Medical School, United Kingdom.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Department for Quality Improvement and Leadership. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare. Department of Social Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4364-9814
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Department for Quality Improvement and Leadership. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8952-8773
2024 (English)In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, ISSN 1353-4505, E-ISSN 1464-3677, Vol. 36, no 3, article id mzae077Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Recent years have seen a dramatic growth in interest in the nature and extent of co-production in the health and social care sectors. Due to the intense proliferation of work on co-production, there is intense variation in practice in how co-production is defined, understood and used in practice.

METHODS: We conducted a narrative review to explore, and provide an overview of, which models of health and social care co-production have been developed, applied and critiqued over the last few decades.

RESULTS: Seventy-three peer reviewed articles met our inclusion criteria. In this set of articles, we identified three broad types of models: conceptual/theoretical; practice-oriented; and presenting a typology. We found that practice-oriented models, predominantly from the Health Services Research and Quality Improvement literature, had largely not drawn on conceptual/theoretical models from the disciplinary fields of Public Administration & Management and Sociology. In particular, they have largely neglected theoretical perspectives on relationships and power and agency in co-production work, as well as the concepts of Service-Dominant Logic and Public Service-Dominant Logic as ways to think about the joint, collaborative process of producing new value, particularly in the context of the use of a service.

CONCLUSION: Our review has identified distinct literatures which have contributed a variety of models of health and social care co-production. Our findings highlight under-explored dimensions of co-production that merit greater attention in the health and social care contexts. The overview of models of co-production we provide aims to offer a useful platform for the integration of different perspectives on co-production in future research and practice in health and social care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2024. Vol. 36, no 3, article id mzae077
Keywords [en]
co-production, models, narrative review
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-65963DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae077ISI: 001299277800001PubMedID: 39120968Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85202779127Local ID: HOA;intsam;966116OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-65963DiVA, id: diva2:1889689
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2018-01431Available from: 2024-08-16 Created: 2024-08-16 Last updated: 2024-09-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Robert, GlennMasterson, DanielKjellström, Sofia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Robert, GlennMasterson, DanielKjellström, Sofia
By organisation
The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and WelfareHHJ, Department for Quality Improvement and Leadership
In the same journal
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 91 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf