Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire in a Japanese context
Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, ISSN 1569-1861, Vol. 26, p. 1-8Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background/Objective

The Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ), which evaluates the perceived relevance of and the perceived ability in everyday technology (ET) use, has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in Swedish studies of older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the ETUQ in a Japanese context in older Japanese adults.

Methods

A sample of older Japanese adults (n = 164) including persons with (n = 32) and without (n = 132) cognitive impairment was interviewed with the ETUQ, including original items (ETs) and added Japanese context-specific items. Data were analyzed using a Rasch measurement model.

Results

The analysis demonstrated acceptable functioning of the rating scale, internal scale validity, person response validity, and person-separation reliability of the Japanese ETUQ according to the Rasch model. However, evidence supporting unidimensionality in the Japanese ETUQ was not consistent in this sample. The added Japanese items did not significantly change the estimated individual person measures of perceived ability to use ET.

Conclusion

The Japanese ETUQ seems to be a sensitive tool to evaluate perceived ability in ET use among elderly people in Japan with and without cognitive impairment. Therefore, it could be used in research and clinical practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2015. Vol. 26, p. 1-8
Keywords [en]
activities of daily living, everyday technology, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, older adults, Rasch measurement model, aged, Alzheimer disease, Article, assessment of humans, cognitive defect, comparative study, controlled study, cross-sectional study, Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, female, human, Japanese (people), major clinical study, male, mild cognitive impairment, Mini Mental State Examination, mobile phone, priority journal, Rasch analysis, rating scale, reliability, validation study, validity
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-59582DOI: 10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.002ISI: 000369680200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84957628771OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-59582DiVA, id: diva2:1733274
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and WelfareAvailable from: 2023-02-01 Created: 2023-02-01 Last updated: 2023-02-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Rosenberg, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rosenberg, Lena
Occupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf