System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO). Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Media, Management and Transformation Centre (MMTC).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4572-4881
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO). Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE). Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Udine, Italy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8203-4655
Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden.
2022 (English)In: Technovation, ISSN 0166-4972, E-ISSN 1879-2383, Vol. 122, article id 102645Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Enabling collaboration across disciplines, business functions, departments, organizations, and industries is a critical innovation management challenge. Successful innovation depends on effective knowledge integration among diverse actors. The concept of boundary objects to achieve knowledge integration has gained increasing popularity within innovation management. Despite the growing relevance, existing literature reviews about boundary objects are sparse. This review examines how boundary objects enable knowledge integration through a systematic analysis. An integrating framework of the scholarship on boundary objects links existing contributions to key theoretical perspectives on the study of boundary spanning for knowledge integration. Relevant publications are identified through a systematic literature review and discussed according to three themes: information processing, cognitive, and learning perspective on knowledge integration. Potential contributions to broader theorizing are highlighted in relation to three innovation settings: cross-functional collaboration, open innovation, and staged product development processes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 122, article id 102645
Keywords [en]
Boundary objects, Business functions, Business industry, Business organizations, Innovation management, Knowledge innovation, Knowledge integration, Management challenges, Systematic literature review, Systematic Review, Integration
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-58774DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102645ISI: 000974559000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85140085879Local ID: HOA;;840129OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-58774DiVA, id: diva2:1707930
Available from: 2022-11-02 Created: 2022-11-02 Last updated: 2023-05-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Caccamo, MartaPittino, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Caccamo, MartaPittino, Daniel
By organisation
JIBS, Business AdministrationJIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO)JIBS, Media, Management and Transformation Centre (MMTC)JIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE)
In the same journal
Technovation
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 176 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf