Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analysis of effective energy consumption of Bluetooth Low Energy versus Bluetooth Classic
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Department of Computing.
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Department of Computing.
2022 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Wireless technology is used daily across the globe. A very common wireless technology is Bluetooth. The Bluetooth technology exists everywhere, from cars to mobile phones and even kitchen appliances. Recently, Bluetooth Low Energy has added support for another physical layer, LE 2M PHY. This physical layer is supposed to be faster and more energy efficient than its predecessor, LE 1M PHY, with a decrease in range. Because of this new physical layer, Bluetooth Low Energy can now compete with Bluetooth Classic during data transmission, in both speed and energy efficiency. This thesis aims to find the breaking point where Bluetooth Low Energy becomes less energy efficient than Bluetooth Classic, in relation to bit rate speed and total amount of bytes sent. Before experiments were conducted, multiple iterations of an artifact had to be done to end up with an artifact that provides valid and reliable data. The experiments were then conducted by changing the bit rate speed and sending different amounts of bytes. The results from the experiments show that Bluetooth Classic is practically both faster and more energy efficient with its fastest modulation than Bluetooth Low Energy is with LE 2M PHY enabled, even though this should not be the case theoretically. Bluetooth Classic is overall more energy efficient than Bluetooth Low Energy and thus the conclusion of this study is that no breaking points between the two technologies exist.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. , p. 45
Keywords [en]
Bluetooth Classic, Bluetooth Low Energy, Energy efficiency, Internet of Things, Throughput, Wireless technologies
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-57970ISRN: JU-JTH-DTA-1-20220170OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-57970DiVA, id: diva2:1683816
External cooperation
Knowit
Subject / course
JTH, Computer Engineering
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2022-08-04 Created: 2022-07-18 Last updated: 2022-08-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1437 kB)1346 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1437 kBChecksum SHA-512
25eab38c70c980df8e61fa685b908bd0c6c9c44d0a662af2ea37700d6b3428db9000b02682f6b66623adf56128c9e19a27baea2332013dbc708844dde47cc7bc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JTH, Department of Computing
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1346 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 55175 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf