Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Multiplicative reasoning: An intervention’s impact on foundation phase learners’ understanding
School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication, HLK, Praktiknära utbildningsforskning (PUF), Mathematics Education Research. School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6453-1623
School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: South African Journal of Childhood Education, ISSN 2223-7674, E-ISSN 2223-7682, Vol. 9, no 1, article id a622Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Given the context of low attainment in primary mathematics in South Africa, improving learners’ understanding of multiplicative reasoning is important as it underpins much of later mathematics.

Aim: Within a broader research programme aiming to improve Foundation Phase (Grades 1–3, 7–9-year-olds) learners’ mathematical performance, the aim of the particular research reported on here was to improve learners’ understanding of and attainment in multiplicative reasoning when solving context-based problems.

Setting: The research was conducted in a suburban school serving a predominantly historically disadvantaged learner population, and involved teachers and learners from three classes in each of Grades 1–3.

Methods: A 4-week intervention piloted the use of context-based problems and array images to encourage learners to model (through pictures and diagrams) the problem situations, with the models produced used both to support problem solving and to support understanding of the multiplicative structures of the contexts.

Results: Cleaning the data to include those learners participating at all three data points – pre-, post-and delayed post-test – provided findings based on 233 matched learners. These findings show that, on average, Grade 1 learners had a mean score average increase of 22 percentage points between the pre-test and the delayed post-test, with Grades 2 and 3 having mean increases of 10 and 9 percentage points, respectively.

Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that young learners can be helped to better understand and improve their attainment in multiplicative reasoning, and suggest the usefulness of trialling the intervention model more broadly across schools. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AOSIS, 2019. Vol. 9, no 1, article id a622
Keywords [en]
Assessment, Foundation phase, Multiplicative reasoning, Raising standards
National Category
Didactics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-43569DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v9i1.622ISI: 000466349300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85063910181Local ID: GOA HLK 2019;HLKPUFISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-43569DiVA, id: diva2:1313225
Available from: 2019-05-02 Created: 2019-05-02 Last updated: 2019-05-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Venkat, Hamsa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Venkat, Hamsa
By organisation
Mathematics Education Research
In the same journal
South African Journal of Childhood Education
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 102 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf