Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Contributions from pragmatist perspectives towards an understanding of knowledge and learning in organizations
Högskolan i Jönköping, Högskolan för lärande och kommunikation, HLK, Livslångt lärande/Encell.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5177-5557
L'Ecole de Management de Normandie.
2014 (Engelska)Ingår i: Philosophy of Management, ISSN 1740-3812, E-ISSN 2052-9597, Vol. 13, nr 2, s. 33-51Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to present an understanding of knowledge and learning in organisations from pragmatist perspectives. Relying on the work of early pragmatists as well as contemporary pragmatists, we introduce a conceptualisation of knowledge as the outcome of inquiry. Knowledge, in this article, is presented as provisional, multi-perspective, both particular and general. Our point of departure here is that the chief value of knowledge is its usefulness in solving problems. Pragmatist views of knowledge are further explicated in our discussion of four pragmatist themes, which we have identified as particularly viable on the basis of Jane Addams’ pragmatist view and the practice of democracy in organised life: 

1) Knowledge as transactional in organisations,

2) Reciprocity and learning in organisations,

3) Experience-based knowledge and meaning-making in organisations, and

4) Sustainability as an ongoing, democratic process in organisations.  

In the pragmatist school of thought we draw upon, a predominant issue is always also the very purpose of knowledge, or what we refer to as ‘usefulness’. Under discussion,we argue that a pragmatist understanding of knowledge and learning in organisations allows us to move beyond the polarisation of cognitive-possession – social-process and instead work from an alternative framework, with a focus on processes of learning and knowledge in organisations that aim at integrative, democratic problem solving.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2014. Vol. 13, nr 2, s. 33-51
Nationell ämneskategori
Samhällsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-25259Lokalt ID: HLKLivslångtISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-25259DiVA, id: diva2:769957
Tillgänglig från: 2014-12-09 Skapad: 2014-12-09 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-05Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Personposter BETA

Gillberg, Claudia

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Gillberg, Claudia
Av organisationen
HLK, Livslångt lärande/Encell
I samma tidskrift
Philosophy of Management
Samhällsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 468 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf