Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
En jämförelse av trä och betong som bjälklag ur ett ekonomiskt och hållbarhetsperspektiv
Jönköping University, Tekniska Högskolan, JTH, Byggnadsteknik och belysningsvetenskap.
2020 (Svenska)Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen), 10 poäng / 15 hpStudentuppsats (Examensarbete)Alternativ titel
A comparison of wood and concrete as a flooring from an economic and sustainability perspective (Engelska)
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The construction industry is affected by the progress of sustainability development. The United Nation has set up sustainability goals which presents in Agenda 2030. To meet these goals, the focus must be on the sustainability. The thesis has been conducted for actors in the construction industry should be given the basis for choosing floor that has low environmental impact and at the same time are economically defensible.

Method: To answer the questions formulations the work began with a document analysis and literature study to collect data. The collected data was used as a base for calculation and LCA. The calculation has been made with BidCon and the LCA with One Click LCA. Eventually an MCA was created to based on the literature study, LCA and calculations.

Results: The study shows that the wood flooring contribute to the least environmental impact but the concreate floor has lower costs. MCA shows that in terms of both economy and environment wooden flooring is most advantageous.

Implications: This conclusion in this report is to make it easier for actors to choose a floor system that is good from an economical and environment point of view. When a constructing a building, the coast of using concrete as a material is favoured but the lowest environmental impact is wood. Actors must therefore decide which priority is most important.

Limitations: The study is limited, only one floor layer with the selected material has been compared. All floors have been given the same lifespan and transport distances.

Keywords: Concrete floor, wooden floor, calculations, LCA, MCA

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2020. , s. 36
Nyckelord [sv]
Betongbjälklag, Träbjälklag, Samverkansbjälklag
Nationell ämneskategori
Husbyggnad
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-50315ISRN: JU-JTH-BTA-1-20200374OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-50315DiVA, id: diva2:1459374
Externt samarbete
Sanna Eriksson
Ämne / kurs
JTH, Byggnadsteknik
Handledare
Examinatorer
Tillgänglig från: 2020-09-03 Skapad: 2020-08-19 Senast uppdaterad: 2020-09-03Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Av organisationen
JTH, Byggnadsteknik och belysningsvetenskap
Husbyggnad

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 973 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf