Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Balanced scorecard for method improvement: Approach and experiences
Högskolan i Jönköping, Tekniska Högskolan, JTH, Datateknik och informatik. University of Rostock, Germany.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7431-8412
Högskolan i Jönköping, Tekniska Högskolan, JTH, Datateknik och informatik.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5881-0669
2017 (Engelska)Ingår i: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling: 18th International Conference, BPMDS 2017, 22nd International Conference, EMMSAD 2017, Held at CAiSE 2017, Essen, Germany, June 12-13, 2017, Proceedings / [ed] Gulden J., Nurcan S., Reinhartz-Berger I., Bera P., Guedria W., Springer, 2017, s. 204-219Konferensbidrag, Publicerat paper (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

Modelling methods provide structured guidance for performing complex modelling tasks including procedures to be performed, concepts to focus on, visual representations, tools and cooperation principles. Development of methods is an expensive process which usually involves many stakeholders and results in various method iterations. This paper aims at contributing to the field of method improvement by proposing a balanced scorecard based approach and reporting on experiences from developing and using it in the context of a method for information demand analysis. The main contributions of the paper are (1) a description of the process for developing a scorecard for method improvement, (2) the scorecard as such (as a tool) for improving a specific method, and (3) experiences from applying the scorecard in industrial settings.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer, 2017. s. 204-219
Serie
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, ISSN 1865-1348 ; 287
Nyckelord [en]
Balanced scorecard, Information demand analysis method, Method engineering, Method improvement, Information systems, Management information systems, Strategic planning, Systems analysis, Systems engineering, Balanced scorecards, Cooperation principles, Industrial settings, Information demand, Modelling method, Visual representations, Planning
Nationell ämneskategori
Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-36746DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59466-8_13Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85021209023ISBN: 9783319594651 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-36746DiVA, id: diva2:1127889
Konferens
International Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development and Support International Conference on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design BPMDS 2017, EMMSAD 2017: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling
Tillgänglig från: 2017-07-20 Skapad: 2017-07-20 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-09-03Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Sandkuhl, KurtSeigerroth, Ulf

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Sandkuhl, KurtSeigerroth, Ulf
Av organisationen
JTH, Datateknik och informatik
Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 149 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf