Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk and benefit judgment of excreta as fertilizer in agriculture: An exploratory investigation in Rwanda and Uganda
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) and Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Stockholm, Sweden.
Decision Research (DR), Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Decision Research (DR) and University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI).
Vise andre og tillknytning
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, ISSN 1080-7039, E-ISSN 1549-7860, Vol. 22, nr 3, s. 639-666Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

This research explores the use of psychometric techniques to improve understanding of psychological mechanisms underlying judgment of excreta as fertilizer in agriculture including other excreta related activities. Participants consisted of environmental health students, smallholder farmers and traders in rural and urban Rwanda and Uganda. The finding reveals an inverse relationship between risk and benefit judgments. This relationship holds for the three groups of participants with significant risk-benefit correlations of p<.0001. This finding is consistent with other studies showing that affect plays a key role in risk perception, judgment and decision making.

Building on this finding, we conclude that individuals with high risk and low benefit judgment for excreta related practices would eschew them or emphasize strict standards. Individuals with a high benefit and low risk judgment would engage in excreta management practices regardless of the actual risks involved. This finding is relevant for risk communication and risk management as it indicates that individuals do not rely only on risk management information they receive concerning excreta and related risks but also depend to an extent on their feelings about these substances when making judgments and decisions regarding the purpose for using excreta as fertilizer and the level of exposure they can tolerate and manage.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2016. Vol. 22, nr 3, s. 639-666
Emneord [en]
Excreta, Fertilizer, Affect, Risk, Benefit, Judgment
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-28869DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1100515ISI: 000371914500005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84960369901OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-28869DiVA, id: diva2:890884
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-01-05 Laget: 2016-01-05 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-01bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Westlund, Hans

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Westlund, Hans
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 243 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf