Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
In search of relevance: exploring board work in hybrid organizations through an engaged scholarship approach
Jönköping University, Internationella Handelshögskolan, IHH, Företagsekonomi. Jönköping University, Internationella Handelshögskolan, IHH, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO).ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1606-3877
2023 (engelsk)Inngår i: Handbook of research methods for corporate governance / [ed] N. Cucari, S. Yamak, S. E. De Falco & B. Lee, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, s. 71-89Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Introductory paragraph: Hybrid organizations blend aspects of different organizational forms, identities, and institutional logics (Battilana & Lee, 2014; Jay, 2013; Pache & Santos, 2013). An ideal illustration of such organizations is social enterprises (hereafter, SE) that primarily aim at developing sustainable solutions to social problems while remaining significantly dependent on commercial revenue for their survival (Doherty, Haugh, & Lyon, 2014). These dual economic/social missions pose a host of challenges to SE governance. Studies suggest that governance in SEs often resembles a “grey zone” where boards involve heterogeneous configurations and practices that seek to minimize the risk of “mission drift” while achieving a balance between external and internal stakeholder demands (Cornforth, 2014; Ebrahim, Battilana,& Mair, 2014; Mair, Mayer, & Lutz, 2015; Mair, Wolf, & Ioan, 2020). Naturally, this requires SE boards to be configured with individuals who hold expertise both in the commercial sector and societal issues. In practice, such ideal configurations are unusual due to SEs’ inclination to pro bono practices and democratic principles that often outweigh the need for board expertise (Cornforth, 2004; Stone & Ostrower, 2007). As a result, SEs need to secure a balance between their dual missions and install an appropriate board that can take stock of the divergent stakeholder demands and design strategies ensuring accountability to the stakeholders. Needless to say, this underscores the importance of boards knowing how to prioritize multiple and often competing stakeholder demands and social issues—a call that has also been highlighted in many recent publications on corporate governance (Amis, Barney, Mahoney, & Wang, 2020; Bachmann, Gillespie, & Priem, 2015; Barney, 2018; Krause & Miller, 2020).

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. s. 71-89
Serie
Handbooks of Research Methods in Management
Emneord [en]
corporate governance, hybrid organization, social enterprise, engaged scholarship, rigor and relevance, stakeholder engagement
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-60261DOI: 10.4337/9781802202892.00012Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85166049496ISBN: 9781802202885 (tryckt)ISBN: 9781802202892 (digital)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-60261DiVA, id: diva2:1753404
Tilgjengelig fra: 2023-04-27 Laget: 2023-04-27 Sist oppdatert: 2023-10-18bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. The role of the board chair: Changing expectations and hybrid organizations
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>The role of the board chair: Changing expectations and hybrid organizations
2023 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this dissertation is to enhance our understanding of the changing role of the board chair and what this means for hybrid organizations and their board work. Historically, the role of the boards and their chairs evolved around safeguarding shareholders’ financial interests. Whilst this responsibility persists, boards are increasingly expected to embrace societal issues in board governance discussions and to rethink performance measurement systems to incorporate the social impacts generated by their organizations. To navigate these challenges, boards are encouraged to adopt hybrid board governance systems that strike a balance between financial and social mission targets. Board chairs can guide boards to secure such a hybrid outlook, but we lack academic insights on this role beyond financial performance. Systematically reviewing four decades of research, the first article of the dissertation demonstrates the need and opportunities for considering divergent stakeholder interests and contextual factors influencing the role of the board chair. Building on this, the second article engages with board chairs and general secretaries in social hybrid organizations and unearths different board-specific and field level challenges that currently hinder boards from implementing social impact measurements. Subsequently, the third article discusses how adopting a qualitative, engaged scholarship approach can generate practice informed research, contributing new understanding for boards and their chairs. Together, these insights offer implications for theory and practice and promote an agenda for future research that embraces a social purpose beyond profit maximization.

Abstract [sv]

Syftet med denna avhandling är att öka vår förståelse för hur styrelseordförandens roll förändras och vad detta betyder för hybridorganisationer och deras styrelsearbete. Historiskt sett har styrelsens och dess ordförandes roll bestått i att skydda aktieägarnas finansiella intressen. Även om detta ansvar kvarstår, förväntas styrelser i allt högre grad lyfta samhällsfrågor i sina styrelsediskussioner vilket föranleder en omprövning av rådande prestationsmätningssystem för att inkludera de sociala effekter som genereras av deras organisationer. För att navigera dessa utmaningar uppmuntras styrelser att anta hybrida styrsystem som kan balansera både finansiella och sociala mål. Styrelseordföranden kan vägleda styrelser för att säkerställa detta hybrida tillvägagångssätt, men vi saknar akademisk kunskap om denna utmaning utöver fokus på finansiella resultat. Genom att systematiskt granska fyra decennier av forskning visar avhandlingens första artikel på behovet av att överväga olika intressenters intressen och kontexter som påverkar styrelseordförandens roll. Med utgångspunkt i detta, undersöker den andra artikeln styrelseordföranden och generalsekreterare i sociala hybridorganisationer och påvisar olika styrelsespecifika institutionella utmaningar som hindrar styrelser från att genomföra mätningar av sin sociala påverkan. Därefter diskuterar den tredje artikeln hur en specifik forskningsmetod kallad “engaged scholarship”, kan generera praktiskt relevant forskning som bygger ny förståelse för styrelser och deras ordföranden. Tillsammans ger dessa insikter bidrag till teori och praktik och främjar en agenda för framtida forskning som anammar sociala syften bortom vinstmaximering.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Jönköping: Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, 2023. s. 91
Serie
JIBS Dissertation Series, ISSN 1403-0470 ; 158
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-62687 (URN)978-91-7914-023-6 (ISBN)978-91-7914-024-3 (ISBN)
Disputas
2023-11-17, B1014, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, 13:00 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2023-10-18 Laget: 2023-10-18 Sist oppdatert: 2023-10-21bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Banerjee, Anup

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Banerjee, Anup
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 126 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf