Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validating peer-led assessments of CPR performance
Jönköping University, Hälsohögskolan, HHJ, Avd. för omvårdnad.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1641-6321
Resuscitation Council (UK), London, UK.
Department of Anaesthetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Innosonian Europe, Farnborough, Hampshire, UK.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: Resuscitation Plus, E-ISSN 2666-5204, Vol. 3, artikkel-id 100022Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

A patient’s survival from cardiac arrest is improved if they receive good quality chest compressions as soon as possible. During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training subjective assessments of chest compression quality is still common. Recently manikins allowing objective assessment have demonstrated a degree of variance with Instructor assessment. The aim of this study was to compare peer-led subjective assessment of chest compressions in three groups of participants with objective data from a manikin.

Method

This was a quantitative multi-center study using data from simulated CPR scenarios. Seventy-eight Instructors were recruited, from different backgrounds; lay persons, hospital staff and emergency services personnel. Each group consisted of 13 pairs and all performed 2 ​min of chest compressions contemporaneously by peers and manikin (Brayden PRO®). The primary hypothesis was subjective and objective assessment methods would produce different test outcomes.

Results

13,227 chest compressions were assessed. The overall median score given by the manikin was 88.5% (interquartile range 71.75–95), versus 92% (interquartile range 86.75–98) by observers. There was poor correlation in scores between assessment methods (Kappa −0.051 – +0.07). Individual assessment of components within the manikin scores demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha ​= ​0.789) compared to observer scores (alpha ​= ​0.011).

Conclusion

Observers from all backgrounds were consistently more generous in their assessment when compared to the manikin. Chest compressions quality influences outcome following cardiac arrest, the findings of this study support increased use of objective assessment at the earliest opportunity, irrespective of background.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 3, artikkel-id 100022
Emneord [en]
Assessment, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Manikin
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-50187DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100022ISI: 000675501600015PubMedID: 34223305Lokal ID: GOA HHJ 2020;HHJÖvrigtISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-50187DiVA, id: diva2:1457615
Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-08-12 Laget: 2020-08-12 Sist oppdatert: 2022-10-21bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Person

Abelsson, Anna

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Abelsson, Anna
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Resuscitation Plus

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 180 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf