Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Publications (10 of 98) Show all publications
Henry, C., Lawton Smith, H., Meschitti, V., Foss, L. & McGowan, P. (2020). Networking, gender and academia: an ecosystems approach. In: H. Lawton Smith, C. Henry, A. Poulovassilis, & H. Etzkowitz (Ed.), Gender, science and innovation: New perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Networking, gender and academia: an ecosystems approach
Show others...
2020 (English)In: Gender, science and innovation: New perspectives / [ed] H. Lawton Smith, C. Henry, A. Poulovassilis, & H. Etzkowitz, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020Chapter in book (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020
National Category
Gender Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-47289 (URN)9781786438966 (ISBN)9781786438973 (ISBN)
Available from: 2020-01-08 Created: 2020-01-08 Last updated: 2020-01-08Bibliographically approved
Oftedal, E. M. & Foss, L. (2019). Hitting the institutional wall? The journeys of three firms from idea to market. In: Tatiana Iakovleva, Elin M. Oftedal & John Bessant (Ed.), Responsible innovation in digital health: Empowering the patient (pp. 140-161). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Hitting the institutional wall? The journeys of three firms from idea to market
2019 (English)In: Responsible innovation in digital health: Empowering the patient / [ed] Tatiana Iakovleva, Elin M. Oftedal & John Bessant, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, p. 140-161Chapter in book (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019
Series
New Horizons in Innovation Management
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-46126 (URN)9781788975056 (ISBN)9781788975063 (ISBN)
Available from: 2019-09-16 Created: 2019-09-16 Last updated: 2019-09-16Bibliographically approved
Ghassim, B. & Foss, L. (2019). How Do Leaders Embrace Stakeholder Engagement for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation?. In: Pfeffermann N. (Ed.), New Leadership in Strategy and Communication: Shifting Perspective on Innovation, Leadership, and System Design (pp. 63-80). Cham: Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>How Do Leaders Embrace Stakeholder Engagement for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation?
2019 (English)In: New Leadership in Strategy and Communication: Shifting Perspective on Innovation, Leadership, and System Design / [ed] Pfeffermann N., Cham: Springer, 2019, p. 63-80Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cham: Springer, 2019
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-47393 (URN)10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_6 (DOI)978-3-030-19680-6 (ISBN)978-3-030-19681-3 (ISBN)
Available from: 2020-01-14 Created: 2020-01-14 Last updated: 2020-01-14Bibliographically approved
Foss, L. & De Paoli, D. (2019). “How does network funding enhance cultural and artistic collaboration across regions?”. In: : . Paper presented at ISBE Conference 2019, 14-15 November, Newcastle, UK.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>“How does network funding enhance cultural and artistic collaboration across regions?”
2019 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-47394 (URN)
Conference
ISBE Conference 2019, 14-15 November, Newcastle, UK
Available from: 2020-01-15 Created: 2020-01-15 Last updated: 2020-01-15Bibliographically approved
Oftedal, E. M., Foss, L. & Iakovleva, T. (2019). Responsible for responsibility? A study of digital e-health startups. Sustainability, 11(19), Article ID 5433.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Responsible for responsibility? A study of digital e-health startups
2019 (English)In: Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 11, no 19, article id 5433Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Responsible innovation (RI) has received increased attention from policymakers and academics as a solution to grand challenges and is viewed as the main driver for innovation. The United Nations has suggested 17 Sustainable Development Goals and responsible innovation can be seen as a tool that allows the movement of society towards reducing inequality, coping with environmental challenges and sustaining countries’ economic and societal development. Our knowledge of how businesses act responsibly in solving these challenges is scarce. An inductive analysis of 14 e-health startups in Norway, shows that responsibility is highly prevalent. Entrepreneurs have instant contact with users (patients or healthcare professionals), which increases inclusiveness, anticipation and reflection as the main elements of responsibility. However, firms' contextual and strategic awareness of responsibility remains low, which means an absence of focused strategies to exercise responsibility. Consequently, entrepreneurial startups are prevented from reaching broader stakeholders and fully reflecting the knowledge obtained. Moreover, RI activities are often bundled with other activities on the "path" to successful commercialization. This paper contributes to and enriches the current RI understanding from a firm perspective and suggests some implications for practitioners as well as policymakers to enhance sustainable development in the healthcare sector.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2019
Keywords
awareness, responsible innovation, startups, e-health, digital health
National Category
Business Administration Environmental Management
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-46558 (URN)10.3390/su11195433 (DOI)
Available from: 2019-10-15 Created: 2019-10-15 Last updated: 2019-10-15Bibliographically approved
Naughton, B. & Foss, L. (2019). Responsible innovation and commercialisation in the university context: A case study of an academic entrepreneur in digital healthcare. In: Tatiana Iakovleva, Elin M. Oftedal & John Bessant (Ed.), Responsible innovation in digital health: Empowering the patient (pp. 197-220). Edward Elgar Publishing
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Responsible innovation and commercialisation in the university context: A case study of an academic entrepreneur in digital healthcare
2019 (English)In: Responsible innovation in digital health: Empowering the patient / [ed] Tatiana Iakovleva, Elin M. Oftedal & John Bessant, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, p. 197-220Chapter in book (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019
Series
New Horizons in Innovation Management
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-46119 (URN)9781788975056 (ISBN)9781788975063 (ISBN)
Available from: 2019-09-16 Created: 2019-09-16 Last updated: 2019-09-16Bibliographically approved
Thapa, R. K., Iakovleva, T. & Foss, L. (2019). Responsible research and innovation: a systematic review of the literature and its applications to regional studies. European Planning Studies, 27(12), 2470-2490
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Responsible research and innovation: a systematic review of the literature and its applications to regional studies
2019 (English)In: European Planning Studies, ISSN 0965-4313, E-ISSN 1469-5944, Vol. 27, no 12, p. 2470-2490Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

While innovation should be about socioeconomic transformation of society, concerns have been raised about its negative externalities including growing disparities within and between regions. Arguably, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) offers a potential solution to address these concerns. However, in theory, its conceptualization and operationalization remain ambiguous. Further, in practice, this makes its application to regional development difficult. Accordingly, this study first conducts a systematic literature review of conceptual papers on RRI. It identifies themes and categorizes them into four domains: drivers, tools, outcomes and barriers. Second, these domains are applied to regional innovation studies. The paper contributes to an increased understanding of RRI and its applications to sustainable regional development as well as how RRI and regional innovation studies can benefit from each other. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2019
Keywords
policy, region, regional development, Responsible research and innovation, stakeholders, systematic literature review
National Category
Economic Geography
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-45901 (URN)10.1080/09654313.2019.1625871 (DOI)000472441100001 ()2-s2.0-85067550996 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2019-09-12 Created: 2019-09-12 Last updated: 2020-01-08Bibliographically approved
Pogessi, S., Mari, M., De Vita, L. & Foss, L. (2019). Women entrepreneurship in STEM fields: literature review and future research avenues. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Women entrepreneurship in STEM fields: literature review and future research avenues
2019 (English)In: The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, ISSN 1554-7191, E-ISSN 1555-1938Article, review/survey (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The aim of the paper is to explore the published management research on women entrepreneurs in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (also known as STEM) fields in order to offer a first, comprehensive state-of-the-art of this research. In doing so, a systematic literature review (SLR) of 32 papers has been undertaken. The results of this SLR show that the literature on this topic is still limited and fragmented. However, seeds have been sown for stimulating the theoretical debate and the empirical knowledge on these issues. Based on our analysis of these selected papers, we offer a vibrant research agenda for future developments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019
Keywords
Women entrepreneurs, STEM, Systematic literature review
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-46133 (URN)10.1007/s11365-019-00599-0 (DOI)2-s2.0-85074458790 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2019-09-16 Created: 2019-09-16 Last updated: 2020-01-08Bibliographically approved
Foss, L., Henry, C., Ahl, H. & Mikalsen, G. H. (2019). Women’s entrepreneurship policy research: a 30-year review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 409-429
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Women’s entrepreneurship policy research: a 30-year review of the evidence
2019 (English)In: Small Business Economics, ISSN 0921-898X, E-ISSN 1573-0913, Vol. 53, no 2, p. 409-429Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper focuses on women’s entrepreneurship policy as a core component of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. We use a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to critically explore the policy implications of women’s entrepreneurship research according to gender perspective: feminist empiricism, feminist standpoint theory, and post-structuralist feminist theory. Our research question asks whether there is a link between the nature of policy implications and the different theoretical perspectives adopted, and whether scholars’ policy implications have changed as the field of women’s entrepreneurship research has developed. We concentrate on empirical studies published in the “Big Five” primary entrepreneurship research journals (SBE, ETP, JBV, JSBM, and ERD) over a period of more than 30 years (1983–2015). We find that policy implications from women’s entrepreneurship research are mostly vague, conservative, and center on identifying skills gaps in women entrepreneurs that need to be “fixed,” thus isolating and individualizing any perceived problem. Despite an increase in the number of articles offering policy implications, we find little variance in the types of policy implications being offered by scholars, regardless of the particular theoretical perspective adopted, and no notable change over our 30-year review period. Recommendations to improve the entrepreneurial ecosystem for women from a policy perspective are offered, and avenues for future research are identified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019
Keywords
Women’s entrepreneurship; Ecosystem; Policy implications; Gender research; Systematic literature review (SLR)
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-41460 (URN)10.1007/s11187-018-9993-8 (DOI)000482385700008 ()2-s2.0-85071007289 (Scopus ID)PP HLK 2019 embargo 12;HLKLivslångtIS (Local ID)PP HLK 2019 embargo 12;HLKLivslångtIS (Archive number)PP HLK 2019 embargo 12;HLKLivslångtIS (OAI)
Available from: 2018-09-17 Created: 2018-09-17 Last updated: 2019-09-16Bibliographically approved
Iakovleva, T. A., Oftedal, E. M. & Foss, L. (2018). Achieving Strategic Fit through RRI -The case of e-Health start-ups in Norway. In: : . Paper presented at ACERE Conference, 6-9 February, Brisbane, Australia.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Achieving Strategic Fit through RRI -The case of e-Health start-ups in Norway
2018 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-46110 (URN)
Conference
ACERE Conference, 6-9 February, Brisbane, Australia
Available from: 2019-09-16 Created: 2019-09-16 Last updated: 2019-09-16Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-9293-338x

Search in DiVA

Show all publications