Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
öhman sandberg, Ann
Alternative names
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Öhman Sandberg, A. (2010). Hållbart utvecklingsarbete på lärarutbildningen. In: Hållbart utvecklingsarbete på lärarutbildningen. Paper presented at NERA's 38th congress, Malmö, Sweden 11-13, March 2010.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Hållbart utvecklingsarbete på lärarutbildningen
2010 (Swedish)In: Hållbart utvecklingsarbete på lärarutbildningen, 2010Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This paper focuses the ongoing developmental work in three projects aimed at enhancing ICT in teacher education. Instead of studying effects after completed developmental work I will in the framework of Yrjö Engeström´s expansive cycle in a three- step procedure clarify if the project organizations have provided or can provide situated preconditions for learning in an ongoing developmental project. I´m interested in preconditions that can enhance the possibility for the results of the developmental projects to lead to sustainable change, long term effects.  First I will with the help of the expansive cycle, clarify contradictions within or between activity systems. I will then investigate if the universities that host the projects have provided preconditions for expansive learning that promote sustainable change in the organizations. Second I will clarify four critical preconditions for sustainable change and discuss them in a socio cultural perspective. Thereafter I will put the four preconditions that I have clarified, in a framework of an expansive cycle. I will finally use the model to clarify preconditions that has made it possible for an expansive learning to take place in the tree developmental projects that I am following in my research.

Keywords
lärarutbildning, IKT, utvecklingsarbete
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-13529 (URN)
Conference
NERA's 38th congress, Malmö, Sweden 11-13, March 2010
Available from: 2010-10-20 Created: 2010-10-20 Last updated: 2010-10-25
öhman sandberg, A. & halvarsson, a. (2010). Learning in large scale development projects: A comparison between two methods to bridge the gap between theory and practice. In: Learning in large scale development projects: A comparison between two methods to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Paper presented at Swedish paricapatory research consortium, Runö, Sweden, 18-19 Nov. 2010.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Learning in large scale development projects: A comparison between two methods to bridge the gap between theory and practice
2010 (English)In: Learning in large scale development projects: A comparison between two methods to bridge the gap between theory and practice, 2010Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Action researchers strive to create an interface between theory and practice. Different methods to organize learning events seeking to create such interface have been developed in Scandinavia. These methods have been used for over forty years and they have influenced different Scandinavian action research perspectives. One method to bridge the gap between theory and practice in large scale development projects is the dialogue conference. Lately in Sweden a new method to integrate theory and practice in large scale projects has emerged, the Analysis Seminar. In the conference paper we will compare a late generation of dialogue conferences (Gustavsen, 2006) with analysis seminars (Halvarsson and Öhman-Sandberg, 2009). Whereas the dialogue conference is quite well documented in the research literature, less is written about the analysis seminar. We will therefore in the paper present two Swedish cases to portrait the use of analysis seminars as a departure for the comparison. As interactive researchers we have used analysis seminars in the presented research projects over a four year period. Democratic dialogue and joint learning are a common ground for the dialogue conference and the analysis seminar. The implications of the differences and the similarities of the two methods will be highlighted and discussed in the paper.

 

 

 

Keywords
action research methods, large scale projects
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-13530 (URN)
Conference
Swedish paricapatory research consortium, Runö, Sweden, 18-19 Nov. 2010
Available from: 2010-10-22 Created: 2010-10-20 Last updated: 2010-10-25
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications