Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Linddahl, Iréne
Publications (10 of 10) Show all publications
Alnervik, A. & Linddahl, I. (2011). Value of occupational therapy - about evidence-based occupational therapy. Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Value of occupational therapy - about evidence-based occupational therapy
2011 (English)Other (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, pages
Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, 2011. p. 42
Keywords
evidence-based occupational therapy
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-15557 (URN)918621084X (ISBN)
Note

Translation of the original in Swedish: Sätt värde på arbetsterapi - en studiecirkel i evidensbasering av arbetsterapi (2006)

Available from: 2011-06-23 Created: 2011-06-23 Last updated: 2016-01-29Bibliographically approved
Linddahl, I. & Norrby, E. (2010). Dialog om arbetsförmåga, DOA, Version 4. Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dialog om arbetsförmåga, DOA, Version 4
2010 (Swedish)Book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, 2010. p. 32
Keywords
arbetsterapi, arbetsförmåga, dialog, delaktighet
National Category
Humanities
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-14230 (URN)91 86210 62 9 (ISBN)
Available from: 2011-01-08 Created: 2011-01-08
Norrby, E. & Linddahl, I. (2007). Dialogue about Working Ability: (DWA) version 3.0. Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dialogue about Working Ability: (DWA) version 3.0
2007 (English)Book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, 2007. p. 34
Keywords
occupational therapy, working ability, dialogue, client participation
National Category
Humanities
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-14231 (URN)91-86210-44-0 (ISBN)
Available from: 2011-01-08 Created: 2011-01-08 Last updated: 2011-01-11Bibliographically approved
Rubenson, C., Svensson, E., Linddahl, I. & Björklund, A. (2007). Experiences of returning to work after acquired brain injury. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14(4), 205-214
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Experiences of returning to work after acquired brain injury
2007 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, ISSN 1103-8128, E-ISSN 1651-2014, Vol. 14, no 4, p. 205-214Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences of returning to work after rehabilitation, from the viewpoint of people with acquired brain injury. A purposive sampling of eight informants was made, and data was collected through personal interviews with open questions. The data was then analyzed through qualitative content analyses in five steps, resulting in four main categories of experiences: “A new person”, “Stimulants and fellowship”, “Understanding and support” and “To reach insight” with appurtenant sub-categories. The overarching theme was “Returning to work after acquired brain injury is a long process”. The conclusion of our study is that returning to work after acquired brain injury requires motivated individuals, flexible work, accommodating labour management and prolonged environmental support. This study also shows that the informants need support for a long period of time to reach balance and to obtain a functional working role. In order to achieve this, one requires client-centred rehabilitation, professional teamwork, and longer follow-up periods than those of today.

Keywords
Environmental support, occupational rehabilitation, outpatient rehabilitation team, qualitative study, work rehabilitation.
National Category
Occupational Therapy Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-6199 (URN)
Available from: 2007-12-14 Created: 2007-12-14 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved
Linddahl, I. (2007). Validity and Reliability of the Instrument DOA: A Dialogue about Working Ability. (Licentiate dissertation). Jönköping: Hälsohögskolan
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Validity and Reliability of the Instrument DOA: A Dialogue about Working Ability
2007 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to examine the construct validity and the reliability of the instrument DOA; Dialogue about working ability. The theoretical foundation for DOA is the Model of Human Occupation. The instrument is divided into two sections; client self-assessment and professional assessment focusing on the individual’s working ability. The assessments are followed by a dialogue to distinguish goals for the return to-work process based on the client’s own preferences. In line with the theoretical base, the concept ‘work’ refers to both paid work and other productive activities related to work.

In Study I, 21 professionals and 126 clients participated from three clinics in Sweden. All clients were involved as outpatients in psychiatric work rehabilitation in county councils or community services. The results from the Rasch analysis test indicated that items are well separated from each other and generally work together in five unidimensional continuums with the objective to measure abilities related to work. Twenty-nine of 34 items showed goodness-of-fit statistics, which means acceptable infit MnSq values from >0.6 to <1.4 in association with Z values from –2 to 2, and that the five misfit items have to be revised.

Thirty-four outpatient clients and 14 professionals from four clinics within psychiatric work rehabilitation in Sweden participated in Study II. Two reliability aspects were studied: test-retest and inter rater reliability. The statistical analyses used were Spearman Rank Correlation test and Percentage of agreement (PA). Generally, the Spearman Rank Correlation test showed acceptable significant correlations between test retest since a greater part of items correlated “moderate to good” (r = 0.51 – 0.75). In the inter raters´ test PA was good, ranging from 93.1 % to 96.5 %, which is well above the acceptable criteria of 80 %. There were no significance differences between the raters. The study has shown that one item has to revised.

The findings verify that DOA has potential as a means of making valid and reliable assessments of working ability, as described by the Model of Human Occupation, out of both clients´ and occupational therapists´ perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Jönköping: Hälsohögskolan, 2007. p. 50
Series
Hälsohögskolans avhandlingsserie, ISSN 1654-3602 ; 1
Keywords
Client dialogue, Goal setting, Occupational therapy, Participation, Rasch analysis, Unidimensionality, Work assessment
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-783 (URN)978-91-85835-00-3 (ISBN)
Presentation
2007-05-11, Forum Humanum, Hälsohögskolan i Jönköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Available from: 2007-04-24 Created: 2007-04-24 Last updated: 2009-04-01Bibliographically approved
Norrby, E. & Linddahl, I. (2006). Dialog om arbetsförmåga: (DOA) version 3.0 (ed.). Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dialog om arbetsförmåga: (DOA) version 3.0
2006 (Swedish)Book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, 2006. p. 34
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-6026 (URN)91-86210-43-2 (ISBN)
Available from: 2007-07-18 Created: 2007-07-18Bibliographically approved
Linddahl, I. (2006). Individen i centrum: Självskattning med instrumentet DOA. In: Vågor på HaVet: Tio texter om arbete och funktionshinder (pp. 145-166). Jönköping: Hälsohögskolan
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Individen i centrum: Självskattning med instrumentet DOA
2006 (Swedish)In: Vågor på HaVet: Tio texter om arbete och funktionshinder, Jönköping: Hälsohögskolan , 2006, p. 145-166Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Jönköping: Hälsohögskolan, 2006
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-6023 (URN)91-631-9205-5 (ISBN)
Available from: 2007-07-17 Created: 2007-07-17 Last updated: 2011-01-08
Norrby, E. & Linddahl, I. (2006). Reliability of the instrument DOA: Dialogue about ability related to work. Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, 26(2), 131-139
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Reliability of the instrument DOA: Dialogue about ability related to work
2006 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 26, no 2, p. 131-139Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Keywords
Adult, Disabled Persons/*psychology/rehabilitation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Self Assessment (Psychology), Sweden, Work Capacity Evaluation
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-6016 (URN)16477105 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2007-07-18 Created: 2007-07-18 Last updated: 2020-06-05Bibliographically approved
Alnervik, A. & Linddahl, I. (2006). Sätt värde på arbetsterapi: En studiecirkel i evidensbasering av arbetsterapi (ed.). : Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, Nacka
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Sätt värde på arbetsterapi: En studiecirkel i evidensbasering av arbetsterapi
2006 (Swedish)Other (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, pages
Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, Nacka, 2006
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-6020 (URN)
Note
Kompendium med material till studiecirkel, utgivet av Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, Nacka.Available from: 2007-07-17 Created: 2007-07-17Bibliographically approved
Linddahl, I., Norrby, E. & Bellner, A.-L. (2003). Construct validity of the instrument DOA: a dialogue about ability related to work.. Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, 20(3), 215-224
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Construct validity of the instrument DOA: a dialogue about ability related to work.
2003 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 20, no 3, p. 215-224Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Keywords
Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Disorders, Occupational Therapy, Questionnaires, Sweden, Work Capacity Evaluation
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-6015 (URN)12775927 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2007-07-17 Created: 2007-07-17 Last updated: 2020-06-05Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications