How preschool teachers and children spend their time in preschool sets the stage for child engagement and learning. To describe characteristics of environments and activities and to compare child engagement in indoor and outdoor free play, systematic observations of children and teachers were performed in 78 Swedish preschool units. Results showed that indoor and outdoor free play were the main activity settings. Children interacted as much with other children as with teachers. The content focus was dominated by non-pretend play, construction, art and music, followed by pretend play and academic contents. Child engagement was significantly higher in free play indoors compared to outdoors. Teachers engaged in varied tasks, but their central task was managing. Teachers were typically in proximity to small groups of children, or by themselves, and mostly talked to or listened to a single child. Findings are discussed in relation to the preschool curriculum and future research needs.

Early intervention for children vulnerable to exclusion is currently focused on the child?s effective inclusion in mainstream early childhood education. There is thus a search for developing a shared understanding of what constitutes quality inclusive preschool provision. This was the aim of a qualitative 3-year (2015?17) study of inclusive settings for children from 3 years to compulsory education across European countries, conducted by the European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. Data consisted of practitioner descriptions of 32 example inclusive preschools from 28 European countries, and more detailed data collected during short visits to eight of the example settings. Qualitative, thematic analysis identified 25 subthemes representing the perceived constituents of inclusive early childhood education provision. These were organised within a framework that intertwined the structure-process-outcome model with the ecological systems model. The resulting adapted ecosystem model for inclusive early childhood education comprises five dimensions: (1) the inclusive education outcomes, (2) processes, and (3) structural factors within the micro environment of the preschool; and the wider (4) inclusive structural factors at community, and (5) at national levels. The framework can be useful for practitioners as well as researchers and policy makers seeking to improve inclusive early childhood education provision.

In line with the primary purpose of ISEI, to provide a framework and forum for professionals from around the world to communicate about advances in the field of early intervention, this symposium aims to discuss and raise issues related to the added value of international collaboration in early childhood intervention research and education today and in the future. It is informed by experiences of the EU-US Transatlantic Consortium on Early Intervention (EU-US Atlantis Programme, Excellence Mobility Project 2001-2013) and from collaboration in ISEI. Building on multilateral collaboration and agreements between universities and funding agencies, based on equal standards for quality we can share and learn from each other. By developing joint priorities building on the strengths in individual countries a common theoretical framework for research and education related to early intervention has been created guiding policy and practice.

Symposium Description:

In line with the primary purpose of ISEI, to provide a framework and forum for professionals from around the world to communicate about advances in the field of early intervention, this symposium aims to discuss and raise issues related to the added value of international collaboration in early childhood intervention research and education today and in the future. It is informed by experiences of the EU-US Transatlantic Consortium on Early Intervention (EU-US Atlantis Programme, Excellence Mobility Project 2001-2013) and from collaboration in ISEI. Building on multilateral collaboration and agreements between universities and funding agencies, based on equal standards for quality we can share and learn from each other. By developing joint priorities building on the strengths in individual countries a common theoretical framework for research and education related to early intervention has been created guiding policy and practice.

In line with the primary purpose of ISEI, to provide a framework and forum for professionals from around the world to communicate about advances in the field of early intervention, this symposium aims to discuss and raise issues related to the added value of international collaboration in early childhood intervention research and education today and in the future. It is informed by experiences of the EU-US Transatlantic Consortium on Early Intervention (EU-US Atlantis Programme, Excellence Mobility Project 2001-2013) and from collaboration in ISEI. Building on multilateral collaboration and agreements between universities and funding agencies, based on equal standards for quality we can share and learn from each other. By developing joint priorities building on the strengths in individual countries a common theoretical framework for research and education related to early intervention has been created guiding policy and practice.

In line with the primary purpose of ISEI, to provide a framework and forum for professionals from around the world to communicate about advances in the field of early intervention, this symposium aims to discuss and raise issues related to the added value of international collaboration in early childhood intervention research and education today and in the future. It is informed by experiences of the EU-US Transatlantic Consortium on Early Intervention (EU-US Atlantis Programme, Excellence Mobility Project 2001-2013) and from collaboration in ISEI. Building on multilateral collaboration and agreements between universities and funding agencies, based on equal standards for quality we can share and learn from each other. By developing joint priorities building on the strengths in individual countries a common theoretical framework for research and education related to early intervention has been created guiding policy and practice.

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the role of three specific factors within the child-environment interaction process - engagement, independence and social interactions - in influencing development and learning of children with disabilities in inclusive preschool settings. The main question is whether children can be categorised in homogenous groups based on engagement, independence and social interactions (proximal variables within a biopsychosocial framework of human development). The study also examined whether children with the same diagnosis would group together or separately, when trying to identify clusters of engagement, independence and social interactions, and additionally whether such clusters vary as a function of individual child characteristics, and/or as a function of structural and process characteristics of preschool environment.

METHODS: Data was taken from an intervention study conducted in mainstream preschools in Portugal. A person-centered cluster analysis was conducted to explore group membership of children with various diagnoses, based on their engagement, independence and social interaction profiles.

RESULTS: Results show that children clustered based on similarity of engagement, independence and social interaction patterns, rather than on diagnosis. Besides, it was found that quality of peer interaction was the only predictor of cluster membership.

CONCLUSION: These findings support the argument that participation profiles may be more informative for intervention purposes than diagnostic categories, and that preschool process quality, namely peer interaction, is crucial for children's participation.

Engagement in preschool predicts children's development, learning, and wellbeing in later school years. The time children engage in activities and social interactions is conditional for preschool inclusion. Engagement is part of the construct participation, which is determined by attendance and involvement. Two suggested underlying dimensions of engagement had been identified as essential when assessing children's participation in preschool activities. As engagement is a key question in inclusion of all children, and preschool becomes a common context for them, it is increasingly important to understand the concept of engagement in those settings. In Sweden most children attend preschool but children in need of special support tend not to receive enough support for their everyday functioning. This study aimed to conceptualize child engagement in preschool with ICF-CY as a framework to clarify core and developmental engagement dimensions included in Child Engagement Questionnaire (CEQ). The content of CEQ was identified through linking processes based on ICF linking rules with some exceptions. Specific challenges and solutions were acknowledged. To identify engagement dimensions in the ICF-CY, CEQ items related to ICF-CY chapters were integrated in the two-dimensional model of engagement. Findings showed that engagement measured for preschool ages was mostly related to Learning and Applying knowledge belonging to Activities and Participation but the linkage detected missing areas. Broader perspectives of children's everyday functioning require extended assessment with consideration to mutual influences between activities, participation, body functions, and contextual factors. Related to core and developmental engagement, findings highlight the importance for preschool staff to pay attention to how children do things, not only what they do. Activities related to core engagement include basic skills; those related to developmental engagement set higher demands on the child. Linking challenges related to preschool context were not consistent with those reported for child health. Using the ICF-CY as a framework with a common language may lead to open discussions among persons around the child, clarify the different perspectives and knowledges of the persons, and facilitate decisions on how to implement support to a child in everyday life situations in preschool and at home.

The wide-ranging educational, economic and social benefits of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC), at both individual and societal levels, are increasingly acknowledged in large parts of the world. Major changes in physical, socio-emotional and cognitive areas of development occur during these years, and meaningful educational experiences have been shown to have long-lasting effects upon a child’s cognitive development, socio-emotional development and learning (Pianta, Barnett, Burchinal, & Thornburg, 2009; Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000; Sylva, 2010). International and European communities (EU, 2011; OECD, 2014; UNESCO, 2015; UN, 2015) regard quality of ECEC as a foundation for later school achievement, success in the modern knowledge based economy and lifelong learning.