Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 138) Show all publications
Fitz-Koch, S., Nordqvist, M., Carter, S. & Hunter, E. (2018). Entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector: A literature review and future research opportunities. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 42(1), 129-166
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector: A literature review and future research opportunities
2018 (English)In: Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, ISSN 1042-2587, E-ISSN 1540-6520, Vol. 42, no 1, p. 129-166Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Heeding calls for contextualizing entrepreneurship research and for greater attention to the role of sector in entrepreneurship research, we conduct a systematic literature review of extant research in agricultural entrepreneurship. Recent and rapid vertical integration and rationalization within the agricultural sector provides a dynamic setting for scholars to investigate entrepreneurship theory and practice. We identify three key contextual dimensions of the agricultural sector: identity, family, and institutions, which provide promising opportunities for future research and the potential to contribute to and extend current theoretical and empirical analyses of entrepreneurship research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2018
Keywords
Entrepreneurship, agriculture, context, systematic literature review, sector studies
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-40871 (URN)10.1177/1042258717732958 (DOI)000428026600006 ()2-s2.0-85053557208 (Scopus ID)IHHCeFEOIS (Local ID)IHHCeFEOIS (Archive number)IHHCeFEOIS (OAI)
Available from: 2018-06-28 Created: 2018-06-28 Last updated: 2018-10-19Bibliographically approved
van Helvert, J. & Nordqvist, M. (2017). Entrepreneurship from a Family Business Perspective. In: Robert Blackburn, Dirk De Clercq & Jarna Heinonen (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship: (pp. 7-123). Sage Publications
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Entrepreneurship from a Family Business Perspective
2017 (English)In: The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship / [ed] Robert Blackburn, Dirk De Clercq & Jarna Heinonen, Sage Publications, 2017, p. 7-123Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2017
Keywords
Small Business/Entrepreneurship (general), Small & Medium-Sized Enterprises
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-38430 (URN)10.4135/9781473984080.n7 (DOI)9781473925236 (ISBN)9781473984080 (ISBN)
Available from: 2018-01-11 Created: 2018-01-11 Last updated: 2018-01-12Bibliographically approved
Waldkirch, M. & Nordqvist, M. (2017). Finding benevolence in family firms: The case of stewardship theory. In: Franz Kellermanns, Frank Hoy (Ed.), The Routledge companion to family business: (pp. 401-414). New York: Routledge
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Finding benevolence in family firms: The case of stewardship theory
2017 (English)In: The Routledge companion to family business / [ed] Franz Kellermanns, Frank Hoy, New York: Routledge, 2017, p. 401-414Chapter in book (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Routledge, 2017
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-34276 (URN)000399599000020 ()2-s2.0-85027376466 (Scopus ID)9781138919112 (ISBN)
Available from: 2016-12-12 Created: 2016-12-12 Last updated: 2017-12-20Bibliographically approved
Boers, B., Ljungkvist, T., Brunninge, O. & Nordqvist, M. (2017). Going private: A socioemotional wealth perspective on why family controlled companies decide to leave the stock-exchange. Paper presented at European-Academy-of-Management Conference, Atlanta, GA, AUG 04-08, 2017. The Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(2), 74-86
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Going private: A socioemotional wealth perspective on why family controlled companies decide to leave the stock-exchange
2017 (English)In: The Journal of Family Business Strategy, ISSN 1877-8585, E-ISSN 1877-8593, Vol. 8, no 2, p. 74-86Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Our purpose is to understand the process of ‘going private’ decisions in family firms by applying a socioemotional wealth (SEW) perspective, specified in the following research questions: how do socioemotional wealth considerations influence owning families’ decisions to delist their publicly-listed companies? How do socioemotional wealth considerations change after the delisting of a firm? Based on case studies of two family firms, we elaborate upon the balancing of socioemotional and financial wealth considerations by the family owners, the assessment of which changes over time. Ultimately, we propose that the experiences from being listed can lead to the reevaluation of financial, as well as socioemotional, wealth considerations. By delisting, the companies reclaim independence and control, and the identity as a private family-owned firm becomes once again pronounced. We develop the SEW-perspective by viewing the decision to delist as a mixed gamble, in that owning families have to weigh personal and financial losses against SEW gains, thereby indicating how SEW-considerations change over time. We find that owning families are willing to sacrifice current SEW, accepting current financial losses for prospective increased SEW. Additionally, in this study we extend the argument that decisions to leave the stock market are tradeoffs between competing factors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017
Keywords
Socioemotional wealth, Family business, Mixed gamble, Going private, Family ownership, Case study
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Humanities and Social sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-35402 (URN)10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.01.005 (DOI)000417670900002 ()2-s2.0-85017464265 (Scopus ID)
Conference
European-Academy-of-Management Conference, Atlanta, GA, AUG 04-08, 2017
Available from: 2017-04-21 Created: 2017-04-21 Last updated: 2018-09-04Bibliographically approved
Fitz-Koch, S. & Nordqvist, M. (2017). The Reciprocal Relationship of Innovation Capabilities and Socioemotional Wealth in a Family Firm. Journal of small business management (Print), 55(4), 547-570
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Reciprocal Relationship of Innovation Capabilities and Socioemotional Wealth in a Family Firm
2017 (English)In: Journal of small business management (Print), ISSN 0047-2778, E-ISSN 1540-627X, Vol. 55, no 4, p. 547-570Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper deals with entrepreneurship in family firms by researching how technology-based innovation capabilities influence the socioemotional dimensions of the owning family and vice versa. In combination with dynamic capabilities, the socioemotional wealth (SEW) perspective offers a framework that enables an investigation of the nature of innovation capabilities in family firms. Studying a single firm, we identify a positive reciprocal relationship between innovation capabilities and SEW. We find that this reciprocal relationship within the family business presents itself in a synergistic fashion, yielding synergies between financial wealth and SEW. The findings contribute to the literature on entrepreneurship and innovation in family businesses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2017
Keywords
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; PERFORMANCE; BUSINESSES; AGENCY; RESOURCES; RISK
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-37672 (URN)10.1111/jsbm.12343 (DOI)000410991700003 ()2-s2.0-85029576853 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2017-10-18 Created: 2017-10-18 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved
Criaco, G. & Nordqvist, M. (2017). The survival of family-firm spawns. In: 2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017: . Paper presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017; Atlanta; United States; 4 - 8 August 2017. Academy of Management
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The survival of family-firm spawns
2017 (English)In: 2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017, Academy of Management , 2017Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

We analyze whether entrepreneurial spawns from family firms are more likely to survive than spawns from non-family firms. Using a matched employer employee panel data set, we find that entrepreneurial spawns from family firms survive longer than spawns from non-family firms. To mitigate endogeneity concerns, we used a two-stage model for self-selection into spawning and implemented coarsened exact matching to compare more closely aligned treatment (family parent) and control (non-family parent) samples. We further show that entrepreneurial spawns from family firms survive longer when located closer to the parent firm and when the founder had longer tenure at the parent firm.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Academy of Management, 2017
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-31930 (URN)10.5465/ambpp.2017.234 (DOI)2-s2.0-85046476139 (Scopus ID)
Conference
77th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017; Atlanta; United States; 4 - 8 August 2017
Note

An earlier version of this paper has been presented at the Strategic Management Society (SMS) Annual Meeting in Madrid (Spain) in 2014 under the title ‘Back to the roots: Inherited ownership effects and spawns’ performance’ with Mattias Nordqvist.

Available from: 2016-10-06 Created: 2016-10-06 Last updated: 2018-07-30Bibliographically approved
Waldkirch, M., Melin, L. & Nordqvist, M. (2017). When the cure turns counterproductive: Parallel professionalization in family firms. In: 2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017: . Paper presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017; Atlanta; United States; 4 - 8 August 2017 (pp. 1-6). Academy of Management
Open this publication in new window or tab >>When the cure turns counterproductive: Parallel professionalization in family firms
2017 (English)In: 2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017, Academy of Management , 2017, p. 1-6Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Pressures to professionalize family firms increasingly encompass ownership practices. Relying on a 10-year single-case study, we show how the parallel professionalization of business and family governance interact over time and how conflicts of norms, introduced through professional practices, affect family and business. We thus cast an ambivalent picture of professionalization. © 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Academy of Management, 2017
Keywords
Family firms, Professional practices
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-41074 (URN)10.5465/ambpp.2017.50 (DOI)2-s2.0-85046469930 (Scopus ID)
Conference
77th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017; Atlanta; United States; 4 - 8 August 2017
Available from: 2018-07-27 Created: 2018-07-27 Last updated: 2018-07-30Bibliographically approved
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Frattini, F., Chrisman, J. J. & Nordqvist, M. (2016). Family governance at work: Organizing for new product development in family SMEs. Family Business Review, 29(2), 189-213
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Family governance at work: Organizing for new product development in family SMEs
Show others...
2016 (English)In: Family Business Review, ISSN 0894-4865, E-ISSN 1741-6248, Vol. 29, no 2, p. 189-213Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A growing body of research is concerned with how family governance influences innovation. Yet, the organizational issues that family governance engenders for innovation processes have been largely overlooked. In a study of six family SMEs, we investigate the design decisions that fit family and business logics to create high-performing new product development programs. Our results reveal three design principles concerning teams, leadership, and incentives that diverge from customary approaches of organizing for new product development, adding important dimensions to the determinants of successful new product development in family SMEs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2016
Keywords
Family SMEs, family governance, innovation, new product development
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-28371 (URN)10.1177/0894486515622722 (DOI)000375720700004 ()2-s2.0-84966565080 (Scopus ID)IHHCeFEOIS (Local ID)IHHCeFEOIS (Archive number)IHHCeFEOIS (OAI)
Available from: 2015-11-24 Created: 2015-11-24 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved
Fletcher, D., Massis, A. D. & Nordqvist, M. (2016). Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: A review and future research agenda. The Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 8-25
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: A review and future research agenda
2016 (English)In: The Journal of Family Business Strategy, ISSN 1877-8585, E-ISSN 1877-8593, Vol. 7, no 1, p. 8-25Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In spite of various calls for a wider application of qualitative research in the family business field, it is our contention that the full potential of qualitative inquiry is not being fully realized. Part of the reason for this relates to the tendency to promote methods choice and diversity rather than addressing the foundational questions and processes which underlie qualitative research choices. These tendencies obscure attention to the reasons why researchers choose qualitative methods and the kinds of foundational issues about family businesses that are brought to light through qualitative research. To address this, we undertake an analysis of the most-cited articles using qualitative methods from an annotated bibliography of family business studies. From this, we identify the strengths and weaknesses of extant qualitative studies in family business research and argue for the need to re-orientate calls in family business research towards the foundational questions (rather than methods) that underline qualitative inquiry. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016
Keywords
Epistemology, Family business, Future research, Interpretivism, Qualitative methods, Qualitative research
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-40873 (URN)10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001 (DOI)000401881800003 ()2-s2.0-84959453185 (Scopus ID)IHHCeFEOIS (Local ID)IHHCeFEOIS (Archive number)IHHCeFEOIS (OAI)
Available from: 2018-06-28 Created: 2018-06-28 Last updated: 2018-06-28Bibliographically approved
Nordqvist, M. (2016). Socio-symbolic ownership: extending the socio-emotional wealth perspective. Management Research, 14(3), 244-257
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Socio-symbolic ownership: extending the socio-emotional wealth perspective
2016 (English)In: Management Research, ISSN 1536-5433, E-ISSN 1558-0946, Vol. 14, no 3, p. 244-257Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to extend the socio- emotional wealth (SEW) perspective in general, and the contribution by Martin and Gomez-Mejia (this issue) in particular. The aim is also to address recent calls to incorporate more micro-level theorizing in the development of the SEW perspective and to embrace the rich, real-world environment in which this phenomenon takes place. Focus is particularly on the SEW dimension that is related to the ability to exercise family control over a business.

Design/methodology/approach - The approach is conceptual and introduces symbolic interactionism, a theory from micro-sociology and socio-psychology, to the SEW literature within the family business field. The paper draws on a previously published study by the author and relies on the centrality of the notion of socio- symbolic ownership in family firms.

Findings - The concepts of socio- symbolic ownership and the process of enacting ownership underline how family and non-family actors interpret and act upon specific guiding values and interests that constitute SEW at a micro level in each family firm. Socio-symbolic ownership and the guiding values and interests that the ownership is based on allow scholars to capture SEW differences among family firms, as the specific values and interests typically vary between family firms.

Originality/value - An approach is outlined that helps scholars to develop a more process-sensitive theory of SEW. Studying how and why actors engage in the social interactions, symbolic relations and interpretations that constitute the decision-making gives a better understanding of the important micro-foundations of SEW, and of the heterogeneity of family firms.

Keywords
Family firms, Socio-emotional wealth, Socio-symbolic ownership
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-35034 (URN)10.1108/MRJIAM-06-2016-0676 (DOI)000392190300004 ()2-s2.0-85032801348 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2017-02-09 Created: 2017-02-09 Last updated: 2018-10-23Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-3613-4233

Search in DiVA

Show all publications